Patent absurdity

Today I was reminded, while reading James Randi’s blog, that there is a potential patent clash in the near future between the absurd ADE651® from Cumberland Industries and the equally absurd KTT (or MOS) from Danie Krügel (where is your “®” Mr. Krügel?).

A summary of what each of these devices claims to do should immediately make it clear that these pseudo-scientific dowsing rods are claiming that they do exactly the same thing.

  ADE651® KTT
Goal To locate concealed substances or people. To locate missing people, concealed substances and the “source” of specific items.
Potential customer Law enforcement agencies and Governments. Law enforcement agencies, commodity producers and mineral mining companies.
Programming A plastic card (which is produced by Cumberland and contains the “signature” of the substance to locate) must be inserted into the machine. An actual sample of the substance to find the “source” of must be loaded into the machine in an unspecified manner. The “signature material” of the loaded substance is used to find anything with the same “signature”.
Maximum Range Between 10m and 5km. Unknown – The KTT has been used in a publicised detection over approximately 400km but, for some reason, must be in the same country.
Technology A vague reference to “electrostatic (ionic) attraction”. A vague reference to “compassionate quantum physics” – a non-existent field of physics.
Use “It was not designed as a pin point locator, but is designed to define the area to be searched.” Has been demonstrated in several cases to identify “lines of search priority” and not specific locations, search teams (or psychics 😉 ) would have to refine the data provided.

If, for the sake of the argument, we assume these dowsing rods are not fake and actually do everything that they claim then there should be a patent race on between Danie Krügel and Cumberland Industries.  These devices have been described as working in similar ways to attain the same results, someone should be really upset here about infringement on their territory – the question is who?  Which one of these two parties is willing to demonstrate that their device does as claimed in double-blind, scientific testing and thereby trump the other party?

My prediction is that neither can claim ownership of this idea because the idea is patently absurd.

Advertisements

~ by James on 17 October 2008.

7 Responses to “Patent absurdity”

  1. Well done highlighting the fraud that is the ADE651, also note another UK scam device (Global Technical) GT200

  2. Thanks to Ivan who sent me a personal message about the Sniffex, another fraudulent explosives detector. And thank you Techowiz for the information about the GT200, I had not heard of it before. For anyone interested in the range of fraudulent explosive detectors that are being sold, refer to the website SniffexQuestions.blogspot.com. For readers looking for more specific information about the GT200, you can have a look at this article.

  3. Hi James, just to clarify a point the ADE range of fraudelent detectors are manufactured by, ATSC (UK) (www.atscltd.com) Cumberland Industries are merely an appointed agent operating out of Jordan.
    regards

  4. Latest on the fake detector scam from BBC Newsnight investigation here:

    or see
    http://ade651gt200scamfraud.blogspot.com
    http://sniffexquestions.blogspot.com/
    http://explosivedetectorfrauds.blogspot.com/

    Thanks,
    Dubious Dick
    The Fake Explosives Detector Campaign group

    P.S. Everyone should thank Techowiz. Without him we would be nowhere on this!

  5. More good news
    http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/02/17/uk-iraq-britain-explosives-idUKTRE71G3H12011021

    the man who said:

    “Whether it’s magic or scientific, what I care about is it detects bombs,” said Maj. Gen. Jehad al-Jabiri, head of the Ministry of the Interior’s General Directorate for Combating Explosives.

    “I don’t care about Sandia or the Department of Justice or any of them,” General Jabiri said. “I know more about this issue than the Americans do. In fact, I know more about bombs than anyone in the world.”

  6. Hi to all. Be grateful if you can sign the following petition. If you can recruit a couple of pals and they do same we could get a really good number.

    Thanks.

    http://www.change.org/petitions/demand-action-and-justice-in-fake-explosive-detectors-scandal

    Also see here for a history of the fraud:

    http://www.scribd.com/full/51676711?access_key=key-11r7th4aq0zgvhd6q2b4

    HISTORY

    http://www.scribd.com/full/51703923?access_key=key-231darif3gwjtk07acrp

    FED ACCOUNTING

    http://www.scribd.com/full/51676708?access_key=key-119dzmlzr6r8yaww7fid

    PICTURE GALLERY

    ROGUES GALLERY

  7. latest media report on the ADE651 here

    http://ade651gt200scamfraud.blogspot.com/2012/01/clinton-rogers-reports.html

Comments are closed.

 
%d bloggers like this: